Asus N750JK

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 62% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus N750JK (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK N750JK
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140521
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 04 '19 at 18:34
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	38%
CPU Throttled	62%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370 42,062 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Memory 51.8 1-Core 24.9 2-Core 47.6 28% 41.4 Pts	4-Core 132 8-Core 179 20% 155 Pts	64-Core 167 10% 167 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 129D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	2.12% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 15.4 Parallax 3.56 2% 7 fps	MRender 5.38 Gravity 1.23 Splatting 4.17 3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.12% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SC100S37256GD 256GB 982 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: S8FM06.9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 28 49 23 112 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Read 268 Write 348 Mixed 210 SusWrite 67.2 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 23.8 4K Mixed 13.9 51% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 2.9 37% 87.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 85%
Seagate ST1500LM006 HN-M151RAD 1.5TB 4,004 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 518GB free Firmware: 2BC10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 84 84 84 83 85 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 82.5 Write 63.2 Mixed 49.7 SusWrite 84.4 51% 69.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.8 186% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB 22,647 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	49.4% Average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 20.5 MC Mixed 16.7 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 12.2 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 154 26% 154 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N750JK Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus N750JK

CPU
Core i7-4700HQIntel $370Bench 62%, 42,062 samples	180x
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	73x
Core i5-4200HIntelBench 57%, 11,882 samples	17x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	166x
GTX 850MNvidiaBench 14%, 13,931 samples	104x

SSD
LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonitBench 83%, 11,477 samples	26x
RBU-SC100S37256GD 256GBKingstonBench 63%, 982 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	17x

RAM
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 22,647 samples	82x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	76x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $370

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16