Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	46.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 X 980-$148 8,133 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 91.2 1-Core 77.6 2-Core 150 65% 106 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 434 43% 352 Pts	64-Core 618 38% 618 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85C5) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.71 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.3% Average	Lighting 55.1 Reflection 56.9 Parallax 47.6 45% 53.2 fps	MRender 64.7 Gravity 63.8 Splatting 53.9 49% 60.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 60%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SNVP325S2256GB 256GB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: AGYA0202 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 105 99 92 98 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	25.3% Poor	Read 150 Write 103 Mixed 118 SusWrite 102 26% 118 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 18.1 4K Mixed 10.6 39% 13.1 MB/s	DQ Read 12.9 DQ Write 32 DQ Mixed 16.9 14% 20.6 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 5x2GB 1,886 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 5 of 6 slots used 10GB DIMM Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	41.4% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 13.1 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 8.5 22% 7.73 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	21x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $409

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16