Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	21.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181207
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 02 '19 at 11:52
Run Duration	328 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Memory 84.8 1-Core 120 2-Core 208 79% 137 Pts	4-Core 479 8-Core 755 76% 617 Pts	64-Core 1,255 78% 1,255 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 89%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 154GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 290 278 250 269 232 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 957 Write 1,183 Mixed 446 SusWrite 274 160% 715 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 73.5 4K Mixed 39 137% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 530 DQ Write 297 DQ Mixed 336 271% 388 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 254%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$130 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 264GB free Firmware: M0CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 416 380 356 376 313 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Read 407 Write 419 Mixed 353 SusWrite 363 87% 385 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 65.7 4K Mixed 32.8 111% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 244 DQ Write 207 DQ Mixed 231 172% 227 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 105%
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226 35,454 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 337GB free Firmware: X31200RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 145 153 150 176 139 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Read 463 Write 341 Mixed 210 SusWrite 145 64% 290 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 59.1 4K Mixed 30.4 111% 38.8 MB/s	DQ Read 209 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 110 106% 167 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 107%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB (2017)-$154 14,088 User benchmarks, average bench 131% 286GB free Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 374 368 381 368 383 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 850 Write 592 Mixed 300 SusWrite 382 118% 531 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 67.9 4K Mixed 35.9 127% 44.4 MB/s	DQ Read 511 DQ Write 457 DQ Mixed 461 352% 476 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 155%
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120 11,799 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 49GB free Firmware: 1.01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 385 400 391 400 383 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Read 365 Write 421 Mixed 274 SusWrite 396 82% 364 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 67.4 4K Mixed 31.5 114% 41.3 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 230 DQ Mixed 210 171% 245 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 101%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$137 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 3TB free Firmware: AR13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 137 126 126 132 123 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	Read 51.5 Write 113 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 129 65% 87.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 7.8 4K Mixed 0.2 183% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 552GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 143 134 135 144 130 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Read 140 Write 112 Mixed 71.2 SusWrite 136 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 114%
AOTECH 2TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2TB free Firmware: 0601 SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 197 181 181 200 176 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 198 Write 146 Mixed 90 SusWrite 185 113% 155 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 110%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 43GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 15GB free Firmware: 4.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 23 20 21 22 20 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.4% Very poor	Read 23 Write 22.7 Mixed 20.3 SusWrite 20.2 16% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.8 111% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 21%
H/W RAID 5 6TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2TB free, PID 0230 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 83 125 136 141 111 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	28.4% Poor	Read 12.8 Write 3 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 120 55% 35.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 4% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x16GB 1,113 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	MC Read 38.1 MC Write 33.8 MC Mixed 35.4 102% 35.8 GB/s	SC Read 24.7 SC Write 20.5 SC Mixed 23.1 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 126%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,850 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,431x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	306x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	280x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	233x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	229x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	202x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	189x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	188x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	177x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	201x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	142x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $127Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	134x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,013

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)