Hp-pavilion KJ169AA-ABA a6332f

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHp-pavilion KJ169AA-ABA a6332f  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTek NARRA2
Memory0.9 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20071029
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 28 '19 at 17:14
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
39.4% Below average
Memory 70.9
1-Core 28.6
2-Core 30.3
34% 43.3 Pts
4-Core 48.6
8-Core 56.6
7% 52.6 Pts
64-Core 65.2
4% 65.2 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6150SE nForce 430
HP(103C 2A58) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 307.68
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80
242GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 20 49 48 51 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 11
Write 9.7
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 36.2
13% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
512, 512, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 4.5
12% 4.27 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 1.4
4% 1.37 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback