Asus H110M-C/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics81.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus H110M-C/BR  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '19 at 00:33
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 190
75% 126 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 332
45% 332 Pts
64-Core 352
24% 352 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$280
Zotac(19DA 4527) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 97.9
Parallax 88.2
85% 97.2 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 93.3
Splatting 72.6
77% 90.7 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 81%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$37
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32070RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 64 38 51 78 158 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 390
Write 41
Mixed 105
SusWrite 83.7
34% 155 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 0.2
47% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 12
47% 104 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 87%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
115GB free
Firmware: GF100-07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 74 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 45.3
Write 42.5
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 74.6
36% 49.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 42%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$27
263GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 117 119 120 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 116
Write 112
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 118
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 70%
Kingston DataTraveler G2 2GB
2GB free, PID 1624
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 9 9.2 9.2 9.2 9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
6.99% Terrible
Read 22.5
Write 9
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 9.1
14% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.99%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
68.7% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 20.8
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 21.1
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H110M-C/BR Builds (Compare 805 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-C/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $389
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback