Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics63.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '16 at 01:34
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 58%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 74.5
2-Core 142
60% 99.3 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 426
42% 342 Pts
64-Core 435
27% 435 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7270
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.2% Good
Lighting 79.2
Reflection 79.3
Parallax 76.2
65% 78.2 fps
MRender 73
Gravity 73.1
Splatting 74.7
60% 73.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$54
103GB free
Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 482
Write 264
Mixed 345
80% 363 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 23.6
92% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 48.4
60% 106 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 91%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 162
Write 129
Mixed 153
112% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.22
81% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$34
529GB free
Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 159
Mixed 158
120% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.32
103% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.8% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 12.1
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 8.4
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback