Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 K 655 401 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	55.5% Above average	Memory 75.8 1-Core 84.2 2-Core 111 57% 90.4 Pts	4-Core 205 8-Core 209 28% 207 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 58%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 22 108 33 2.6 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 295 Write 174 Mixed 178 SusWrite 32.6 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 34.2 4K Mixed 17.2 56% 20.7 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 173 DQ Mixed 98.2 88% 132 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 85%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 150 111 124 141 115 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Read 158 Write 156 Mixed 79.8 SusWrite 131 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 222% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 101%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB 12,928 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 301GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 79 75 81 73 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Read 112 Write 102 Mixed 86.4 SusWrite 79.3 70% 94.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	32% Below average	MC Read 10.6 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 13.5 31% 11 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 8.3 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 88.6 45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $187

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16