Cisco N20-B6625-1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemCisco N20-B6625-1  (all builds)
MotherboardCisco N20-B6625-1
Memory47.1 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150811
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 18 '19 at 15:01
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
50.2% Above average
1-Core 77.3
2-Core 146
53% 112 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 510
48% 390 Pts
64-Core 974
65% 974 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 58%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Citrix Virtual Hard Disk 42GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 20 78 77 79 77 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57% Above average
Read 68.8
Write 22.3
Mixed 71
SusWrite 55.1
12% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 48.9
153% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 51.4
DQ Write 65.3
DQ Mixed 58
44% 58.2 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57%
Great: 57%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 146GB
109GB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 54 60 54 56 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 45.9
Write 15.5
Mixed 82.8
SusWrite 50.5
37% 48.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 12x8GB
12 of 12 slots used
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
44.5% Average
MC Read 20
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 17
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 6
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 62%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $55
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback