Cisco N20-B6625-1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemCisco N20-B6625-1  (all builds)
MotherboardCisco N20-B6625-1
Memory47.1 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150811
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 18 '19 at 15:01
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 76
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 156
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 494
48% 393 Pts
64-Core 955
59% 955 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 65%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Citrix Virtual Hard Disk 42GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 20 78 77 79 77 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57% Above average
Read 68.8
Write 22.3
Mixed 71
SusWrite 55.1
12% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 48.9
153% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 51.4
DQ Write 65.3
DQ Mixed 58
44% 58.2 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57%
Great: 57%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 146GB
109GB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 54 60 54 56 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 45.9
Write 15.5
Mixed 82.8
SusWrite 50.5
37% 48.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12x8GB
12 of 12 slots used
96GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
44.5% Average
MC Read 20
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 17
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 6
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback