HP 500-333nl

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP 500-333nl (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140718
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 07 '19 at 15:23
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60 13,224 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	75.6% Very good	Memory 83.3 1-Core 112 2-Core 234 80% 143 Pts	4-Core 367 8-Core 570 58% 468 Pts	64-Core 570 35% 570 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60 26,874 User benchmarks, average bench 10% HP(103C 6893) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 425.31 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Lighting 13.3 Reflection 13.1 Parallax 10.1 11% 12.2 fps	MRender 11.7 Gravity 12.3 Splatting 14.3 11% 12.8 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 429 371 340 202 170 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 453 Mixed 381 SusWrite 330 93% 414 MB/s	4K Read 40.7 4K Write 94.7 4K Mixed 54.6 182% 63.3 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 361 271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 134%
Sandisk SDSA6DM-016G-1006 16GB 187 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 11GB free Firmware: U221006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 50 51 54 53 54 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	Read 238 Write 53.1 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 52.4 22% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 11.9 4K Mixed 10.1 47% 13.5 MB/s	DQ Read 26.5 DQ Write 10.9 DQ Mixed 13.2 11% 16.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 28%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$81 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 5GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 77 79 77 78 81 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Read 71.4 Write 76.7 Mixed 24 SusWrite 77.2 45% 62.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$81 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 88GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 81 76 79 81 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	42.2% Average	Read 69.4 Write 69.9 Mixed 32.3 SusWrite 77.8 46% 62.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 79% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 2x8GB 7,464 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	57.3% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 16.8 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 20.3 55% 19.3 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 500-333nl Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: HP 500-333nl

CPU
Core i7-4790SIntel $60Bench 72%, 13,224 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 745 (OEM)Nvidia $60Bench 10%, 26,874 samples	2x

RAM
16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 53%, 7,464 samples	1x
M378B1G73QH0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 6,401 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $120

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP 500-333nl

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: HP 500-333nl

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)