Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	195% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro-CF (all builds)
Memory	21.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170704
Uptime	9.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 30 '19 at 15:10
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216 22,334 User benchmarks, average bench 78% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Memory 68.4 1-Core 116 2-Core 224 74% 136 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 505 57% 447 Pts	64-Core 1,008 62% 1,008 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 120F) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.39 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	105% Outstanding	Lighting 144 Reflection 127 Parallax 125 118% 132 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 114 Splatting 88.2 84% 105 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 364GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 731 636 631 623 627 626 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	195% Outstanding	Read 1,614 Write 1,358 Mixed 586 SusWrite 646 234% 1,051 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 98.5 4K Mixed 52.2 161% 59.5 MB/s	DQ Read 953 DQ Write 871 DQ Mixed 817 639% 880 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 195% Great: 254%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 163 170 168 165 163 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 173 Mixed 39 SusWrite 166 102% 141 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	79.9% Very good	MC Read 22 MC Write 48.6 MC Mixed 25.1 91% 31.9 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 18.4 SC Mixed 8.3 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro-CF Builds (Compare 217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro-CF

CPU
Core i9-10900XIntelBench 85%, 6,322 samples	31x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	31x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	27x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	30x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	19x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	18x

SSD
760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $4Bench 228%, 10,188 samples	9x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	8x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	7x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	57x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	28x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 133% - Outstanding

Total price: $199

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16