Asus CM1730/CM1830

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	17.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus CM1730/CM1830 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CM1730,CM1830
Memory	6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130327
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 19 '19 at 19:16
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	58.8% Above average	Memory 85.2 1-Core 47.4 2-Core 94.6 50% 75.7 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 190 26% 190 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
PNY XLR8 120GB-$150 48 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: 524ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.2 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17.7% Very poor	Read 148 Write 51.3 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 4.8 11% 53 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 7.9 39% 9.8 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 39%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 8GB free Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 62 61 60 55 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	Read 81.3 Write 58.5 Mixed 52.5 SusWrite 56.8 46% 62.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 87% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 16GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 65 64 61 56 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Read 158 Write 108 Mixed 67.2 SusWrite 59.5 72% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 113%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 34GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 5GB free, PID 00a9 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 8.3 9.2 9.1 9.1 9.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	6.05% Terrible	Read 22.6 Write 10.2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 8.8 13% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.05% Great: 9%
WD My Book Essentials 1TB 3,704 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 7GB free, PID 1110 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 9.5 9.5 9.4 9.5 9.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	9.65% Terrible	Read 26.2 Write 25.2 Mixed 24.2 SusWrite 9.5 28% 21.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.4 56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.65% Great: 20%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 9,009 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 10GB free, PID a006 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 9.8 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 26.9 Write 27.3 Mixed 20 SusWrite 9.7 27% 21 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 43%
WD easystore 25FA 4TB 7,384 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 7GB free, PID 25fa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.7 9.6 9.5 9.6 9.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	7.87% Terrible	Read 28.6 Write 24.7 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 9.6 28% 21.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 7.87% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 12.6 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 9.6 23% 7.9 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CM1730/CM1830 Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus CM1730/CM1830

CPU
Athlon II X2 220AMDBench 39%, 5,045 samples	16x
Phenom II X6 1065TAMDBench 55%, 1,141 samples	10x
Phenom II X4 925AMD $150Bench 51%, 5,211 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	9x
HD 7850AMD $174Bench 19%, 49,592 samples	5x
Radeon HD 8490AMDBench 2%, 4,568 samples	3x

SSD
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	2x
CS900 240GBPNY $22Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	2x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	7x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 15% - Very poor

Total price: $25

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16