Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130227
Uptime	6.8 Days
Run Date	Apr 18 '19 at 15:30
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Memory 94.4 1-Core 108 2-Core 215 80% 139 Pts	4-Core 401 8-Core 520 59% 461 Pts	64-Core 516 32% 516 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Lighting 34.6 Reflection 31.8 Parallax 39.8 28% 35.4 fps	MRender 42.1 Gravity 41.7 Splatting 35.7 32% 39.8 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 450 Write 447 Mixed 383 95% 427 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 61.7 4K Mixed 41.6 135% 45.2 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 366 275% 368 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 427GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 96 97 99 99 99 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Read 104 Write 92.5 Mixed 68.6 SusWrite 97.9 67% 90.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 76%
Nokia S60 32GB 17GB free, PID 03e4 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	4.36% Terrible	Read 3.2 Write 3 Mixed 3.5 SusWrite 2.6 4% 3.07 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1 72% 1.03 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 23,732 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 18.6 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 18.8 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 58.8 68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B75M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,866 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H - $80

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	870x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	596x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	355x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	375x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	252x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	182x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	172x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	98x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	87x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	52x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	45x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $405

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16