Performance Results


Gaming 95% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 93% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	98% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190125
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '19 at 21:39
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	Memory 92.2 1-Core 121 2-Core 246 86% 153 Pts	4-Core 486 8-Core 874 82% 680 Pts	64-Core 1,321 82% 1,321 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% PowerColor(148C 2387) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1682 MHz, MLim: 1100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	98% Outstanding	Lighting 117 Reflection 94 Parallax 192 96% 134 fps	MRender 92.4 Gravity 144 Splatting 133 103% 123 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 131GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,142 Write 1,346 Mixed 543 294% 1,344 MB/s	4K Read 42 4K Write 159 4K Mixed 61 226% 87.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,091 DQ Write 997 DQ Mixed 667 604% 918 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 44,403 User benchmarks, average bench 196% 253GB free Firmware: CXY7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 872 643 638 642 641 635 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	254% Outstanding	Read 1,900 Write 1,555 Mixed 918 SusWrite 678 281% 1,263 MB/s	4K Read 59.6 4K Write 164 4K Mixed 81.1 281% 102 MB/s	DQ Read 1,148 DQ Write 1,065 DQ Mixed 1,033 795% 1,082 MB/s
Poor: 126% ↑ This bench: 254% Great: 259%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 465GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 467 481 486 441 297 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	125% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 479 Mixed 456 SusWrite 436 106% 469 MB/s	4K Read 41.4 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 58.2 197% 70.5 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 362 DQ Mixed 370 279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4C3200C14 4x8GB 393 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	114% Outstanding	MC Read 44.1 MC Write 39.7 MC Mixed 39.2 117% 41 GB/s	SC Read 28.4 SC Write 42.3 SC Mixed 33.7 99% 34.8 GB/s	Latency 63.8 63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 143%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 97%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	54x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	43x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	41x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	55x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	38x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	34x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $1,083

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16