PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Wortmann_ag EU1001284;2110087 (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK PRIME B360M-A |
Memory | 2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180319 |
Uptime | 7.6 Days |
Run Date | Apr 17 '19 at 21:08 |
Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 20% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
81.2%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.81
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$42
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF360000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 13 3.2 4.3 7 22 MB/s
|
34.9%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 197 193 194 196 200 MB/s
|
93.4%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
52.2%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 8x |
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples | 4x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 2x |
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $300Bench 59%, 180,577 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 79% - Very good | Total price: $173 |