Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3455 3,455 User benchmarks, average bench 29% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	Memory 25.6 1-Core 33.5 2-Core 61.7 23% 40.3 Pts	4-Core 102 8-Core 103 14% 103 Pts	64-Core 107 7% 107 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6026 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.05% Terrible	Lighting 1.53 Reflection 2 Parallax 1.53 1% 1.69 fps	MRender 1.71 Gravity 1.03 Splatting 0.04 1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.05% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Power 128GB 128GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0407A SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 179 184 184 185 178 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.4% Average	Read 310 Write 180 Mixed 143 SusWrite 179 45% 203 MB/s	4K Read 8.9 4K Write 35.1 4K Mixed 7 41% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 68.2 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 48.7 56% 92.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 123456789012345678 8GB 198 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	19.8% Very poor	MC Read 6.3 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 7.4 22% 7.67 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 3.4 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 282 14% 282 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	485x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	478x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	457x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,363x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	486x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	354x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16