PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7798 |
Motherboard | MSI B75MA-P45 (MS-7798) (all builds) |
Memory | 10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130930 |
Uptime | 1 Days |
Run Date | Apr 15 '19 at 21:38 |
Run Duration | 161 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 37% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
63%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Gigabyte(1458 3624) 3GB
CLim: 1359 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.35
|
48.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 73 71 84 114 138 MB/s
|
63.5%
Good
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$128
330GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 100 100 99 100 MB/s
|
58.3%
Above average
|
|||
WD 10EAVS External 1TB
605GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 19 20 20 20 20 MB/s
|
13.8%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 1TB
700GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 19 20 20 20 19 MB/s
|
14.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
51.6%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 310x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 228x |
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 100x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 107x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 91x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 59x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $624 |