Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming K4 (all builds)
Memory	28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171227
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '19 at 01:21
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	79.9% Very good	Memory 76.1 1-Core 114 2-Core 225 77% 138 Pts	4-Core 449 8-Core 711 71% 580 Pts	64-Core 935 58% 935 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Nvidia(10DE 12FE) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 425.31 Performing below potential (52^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	103% Outstanding	Lighting 128 Reflection 121 Parallax 138 104% 129 fps	MRender 175 Gravity 121 Splatting 97.4 103% 131 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 120GB 3,514 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 461 Write 418 Mixed 404 95% 428 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 56.3 194% 68.5 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 351 265% 353 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 115%
AMD Radeon R3 240GB 4,257 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 83GB free Firmware: P0422C SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 80 80 80 79 75 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Read 488 Write 333 Mixed 387 SusWrite 117 74% 331 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 86.6 4K Mixed 40.9 140% 51.7 MB/s	DQ Read 282 DQ Write 275 DQ Mixed 223 183% 260 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 90%
Seagate ST3200827AS 200GB-$128 2,755 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 20GB free Firmware: 3.AAE SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 40 26 41 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	28.9% Poor	Read 61.5 Write 27.3 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 38.9 26% 36.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 131% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 36%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB 10,285 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 476GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 162 164 161 163 164 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Read 137 Write 134 Mixed 57 SusWrite 163 89% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.3 140% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88 40,945 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 202GB free Firmware: CC1H SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 73 74 74 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	Read 65 Write 57.3 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 72.8 42% 58 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 70%
Seagate Portable 500GB 3,247 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 391GB free, PID 2300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Read 37.5 Write 34.3 Mixed 26.5 SusWrite 39.3 46% 34.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2400C15/16G KHX2400C15/8G KHX2400C15/8G 32GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	MC Read 32.3 MC Write 31.2 MC Mixed 29.2 88% 30.9 GB/s	SC Read 22.4 SC Write 32.6 SC Mixed 27.1 78% 27.4 GB/s	Latency 88.1 45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	43x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	24x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	19x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBAdata $80Bench 279%, 85,928 samples	8x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $734

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)