Razer Blade

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC). CPU throttled at 50% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRAZER RAZER
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140728
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 02 '19 at 00:57
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 18%
CPU Throttled 50%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-4702HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
1-Core 21.8
2-Core 47.7
16% 34.8 Pts
4-Core 94.9
8-Core 136
15% 116 Pts
64-Core 142
10% 142 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Intel(8086 0416) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4414
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
1.57% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 11.2
2% 8.77 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 3.7
Splatting 9.5
2% 8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.57%
Great: 3%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTE512HMJH-000SO 512GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT2200Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 50 50 43 42 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 301
Write 77.2
Mixed 127
SusWrite 52
30% 139 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 30.3
4K Mixed 18.1
67% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 63.5
DQ Mixed 74.8
65% 99.3 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
44.9% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 16.2
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 7.2
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 58%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 3,595 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $205Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $375Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback