Asus X550VC

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus X550VC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X550VC
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131016
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 31 '19 at 15:21
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3340M 12,487 User benchmarks, average bench 53% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	60.9% Good	Memory 86.5 1-Core 86.6 2-Core 142 65% 105 Pts	4-Core 207 8-Core 206 28% 206 Pts	64-Core 195 12% 195 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 124D) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.98% Terrible	Lighting 2.57 Reflection 6.15 Parallax 3.12 2% 3.95 fps	MRender 5.38 Gravity 2.53 Splatting 8.35 5% 5.42 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.98% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 MAX IOPS 120GB-$106 3,124 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.50 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 65 131 166 169 173 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	55% Above average	Read 329 Write 187 Mixed 200 SusWrite 134 47% 212 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 41 4K Mixed 24.3 77% 27.2 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 153 130% 191 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 88%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB 66,048 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 312GB free Firmware: GG2OAF10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 35 62 62 63 63 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	29.5% Poor	Read 48.2 Write 56.9 Mixed 22.1 SusWrite 54.3 33% 45.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.4 83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 58%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 1GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.4 2.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	0.94% Terrible	Read 3 Write 2 Mixed 2.2 SusWrite 2.2 3% 2.35 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 0.94% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron MT8KTF51264HZ-1G6 Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16.7 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 15.9 SC Mixed 16 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X550VC Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X550VC

CPU
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	173x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	17x
Core i5-3337UIntelBench 47%, 33,616 samples	3x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	152x
GeForce GT 720MNvidiaBench 4%, 4,823 samples	44x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x

RAM
EBJ40UG8EFU0 Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 8GBElpidaBench 49%, 203 samples	20x
MT8KTF51264HZ-1G6 Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 6GBMicronBench 41%, 542 samples	18x
EBJ40UG8EFU0 1x4GBElpidaBench 29%, 3,036 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16