Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G3260 9,453 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	60.1% Good	Memory 88 1-Core 98.5 2-Core 194 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 192 25% 190 Pts	64-Core 195 12% 195 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz) 43,454 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8534) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4264 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.04% Terrible	Lighting 2.03 Reflection 3.58 Parallax 3.19 2% 2.93 fps	MRender 5.24 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 3.83 3% 3.4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.04% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: 605ABBF2 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 200 Write 125 Mixed 172 37% 165 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 98.6 4K Mixed 27 128% 51 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 151 DQ Mixed 124 96% 131 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-010.A00LF 9905584-032.A00LF 8GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	50.8% Above average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 15.8 50% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 15.7 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 69.5 58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	565x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	477x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	413x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	147x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	91x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	89x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $287

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16