Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X3 720 2,612 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Memory 90.7 1-Core 47.1 2-Core 95 52% 77.6 Pts	4-Core 141 8-Core 143 19% 142 Pts	64-Core 142 9% 142 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics 21,841 User benchmarks, average bench 1% MSI(1462 7641) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.48% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1.31 Parallax 0.31 0% 0.71 fps	MRender 0.81 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 1.13 1% 0.71 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.48% Great: 1%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 398GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC49 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete	Read 74.2 Mixed 37.3 42% 55.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 114% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 3GB free Firmware: KC45 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 105 Write 100 Mixed 50.2 63% 85.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown T2G88U1-H9M 4GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1380, 1380 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 12.3 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 8.9 22% 7.67 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	54x
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	33x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	16x

RAM
2x4GBAdataBench 60%, 13,050 samples	12x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	9x
99U5471-054.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 30%, 12,132 samples	9x

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $134

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16