Asus MAXIMUS VI FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMar 23 '19 at 01:57
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 72
2-Core 117
59% 92.6 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 354
33% 274 Pts
64-Core 493
30% 493 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Asus(1043 8495) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.36
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.8% Poor
Lighting 33.2
Reflection 38.3
Parallax 31.1
27% 34.2 fps
MRender 46.9
Gravity 33.2
Splatting 39.1
32% 39.7 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 197 189 286 360 301 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 324
Write 107
Mixed 199
SusWrite 256
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 41.9
4K Mixed 22.8
77% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 133
138% 229 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 116%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
103GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 354 328 327 284 237 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 350
Write 340
Mixed 302
SusWrite 314
74% 326 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 48.5
4K Mixed 29.1
93% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 293
232% 322 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 134%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 118 121 122 121 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 104
Write 114
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 119
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 109%
WD WD2500PD-07FZB1 250GB
78GB free
Firmware: 04.05F04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 30 31 30 30 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 27
Write 22
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 30.1
19% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
67.9% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 23.2
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 14.5
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VI FORMULA Builds (Compare 832 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI FORMULA - $400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $761
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback