Gigabyte GA-H270M-Gaming3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H270M-Gaming3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H270M-Gaming3-CF (all builds)
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170425
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 22 '19 at 02:57
Run Duration	395 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Memory 85.6 1-Core 131 2-Core 234 85% 150 Pts	4-Core 408 8-Core 680 66% 544 Pts	64-Core 705 44% 705 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.16 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.4% Above average	Lighting 72.9 Reflection 75.8 Parallax 65.2 59% 71.3 fps	MRender 69.7 Gravity 68.3 Splatting 0 33% 46 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 147GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 286 283 277 277 272 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 448 Write 427 Mixed 378 SusWrite 299 87% 388 MB/s	4K Read 37.5 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 57.7 190% 68.7 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 350 264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 158GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 141 133 143 142 141 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	87.9% Excellent	Read 166 Write 139 Mixed 31 SusWrite 140 86% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.C16FHD 2x16GB 517 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	77.6% Very good	MC Read 28.7 MC Write 29.4 MC Mixed 24.2 78% 27.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 31.5 SC Mixed 23.2 69% 24.3 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H270M-Gaming3-CF Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270M-Gaming3-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	35x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	34x
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	18x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	13x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	11x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
S3 512G 512GBSandiskBench 96%, 10,855 samples	5x
PLUS 120GBSandiskBench 43%, 16,974 samples	4x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	16x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	5x
KHX2666C15D4/4G KHX2400C15D4/4G KHX2666C15D4/4G KHX2400C15D4/4G 16GBKingstonBench 82%, 206 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $255

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16