HP nc6340

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 12 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP nc6340  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 30AA
Memory1.9 GB free of 3 GB @ 1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060428
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 11 '19 at 20:51
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel T2400
U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Memory 32.5
1-Core 21.9
2-Core 29.3
19% 27.9 Pts
4-Core 32.3
8-Core 31.5
4% 31.9 Pts
64-Core 33.1
2% 33.1 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 38%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHV2080BH 80GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 892C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 10 12 8.9 7.3 6.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
9.7% Terrible
Read 24.7
Write 20
Mixed 16.3
SusWrite 8.9
13% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
48% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.7%
Great: 20%
MS 320GB
209GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 22 24 16 17 22 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 24.3
Write 23.3
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 18.5
26% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
62% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
7.65% Terrible
MC Read 2.7
MC Write 2.2
MC Mixed 2.4
7% 2.43 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 2.2
6% 1.93 GB/s
Latency 240
17% 240 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.65%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback