Gigabyte GA-X79-UD5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X79-UD5  (all builds)
Memory20.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131009
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateMar 10 '19 at 11:00
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4960X-$1,189
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
80% Very good
Memory 94.7
1-Core 115
2-Core 218
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 592
58% 472 Pts
64-Core 859
53% 859 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 196
Parallax 176
136% 180 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 174
Splatting 124
114% 140 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 379 385 373 368 358 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 355
Mixed 395
SusWrite 370
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 30.7
142% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 354
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 101%
Great: 133%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
27GB free
Firmware: 1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 58 56 53 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
41% Average
Read 63.7
Write 110
Mixed 90.7
SusWrite 56.7
18% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 23.8
97% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 65.6
65% 104 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41%
Great: 61%
Hitachi HUS 726T6TALE6L4 6TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: VKGN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 86 93 81 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 175
Write 139
Mixed 61.3
SusWrite 87.6
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 1
217% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 134%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
758GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 113 114 114 115 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 113
Write 115
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 114
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 100%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
599GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 99 100 101 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 165
Write 152
Mixed 90.8
SusWrite 99.9
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 1
217% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
275GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 138 140 140 144 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 140
Write 141
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 140
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 47
MC Write 47.5
MC Mixed 46.2
134% 46.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 14.1
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 57.9
69% 57.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 118%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X79-UD5 Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79-UD5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $397
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback