Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	95% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus Z10PE-D8 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z10PE-D8 WS
Memory	27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20151104
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 18 '16 at 11:46
Run Duration	87 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 352 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Memory 62.5 1-Core 56.6 2-Core 114 46% 77.6 Pts	4-Core 231 8-Core 470 41% 350 Pts	64-Core 1798 111% 1798 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gainward(10B0 1401) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6839 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	34.5% Below average	Lighting 44.7 Reflection 43.3 Parallax 38.5 36% 42.2 fps	MRender 39.2 Gravity 39.5 Splatting 35 31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 36%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 245 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 51 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 57 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1605201131	95% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 398 Mixed 410 97% 435 MB/s	4K Read 38.6 4K Write 60.8 4K Mixed 36.8 138% 45.4 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 81 91% 156 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 95% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x16GB 46,387 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	35.4% Below average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 12.6 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 11.1 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 164%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z10PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 102%

UFO

System: Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v41stBench 65%, 987 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	36x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	22x
GTX Titan XNvidia $615Bench 75%, 15,621 samples	19x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	13x
750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GBIntel $550Bench 186%, 8,641 samples	11x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	10x

RAM
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	21x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G6D1 8x8GBMicronBench 92%, 150 samples	12x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $643

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16