Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	26.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E4500-$130 8,675 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Memory 68.9 1-Core 25.3 2-Core 50.5 34% 48.2 Pts	4-Core 50.2 8-Core 50.6 7% 50.4 Pts	64-Core 50.4 3% 50.4 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 39%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 181 59 49 44 59 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.1% Poor	Read 240 Write 228 Mixed 216 SusWrite 94.2 44% 195 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 6.8 4K Mixed 0.5 40% 10.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 3.7 12% 4.17 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.2 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	3x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	3x
Core2 Duo E4500Intel $130Bench 33%, 8,675 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	2x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	2x
Radeon HD 6670AMDBench 6%, 32,193 samples	2x

SSD
Ultra II 240GBSanDisk $40Bench 82%, 53,931 samples	2x
Fury 120GBHyperX $160Bench 64%, 11,403 samples	1x
850 120GBSamsungBench 95%, 3,514 samples	1x

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $242

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16