Asus X510UAR

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus X510UAR (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X510UAR
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180724
Uptime	6.4 Days
Run Date	Mar 06 '19 at 09:10
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	24%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8250U 234,942 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Memory 70.7 1-Core 108 2-Core 204 71% 127 Pts	4-Core 368 8-Core 570 58% 469 Pts	64-Core 67.7 4% 67.7 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R) 420,154 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1D30) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6286 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7% Terrible	Lighting 7.7 Reflection 10.2 Parallax 7.53 6% 8.46 fps	MRender 6.19 Gravity 7 Splatting 15.3 8% 9.5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT250MX500SSD4 250GB 16,301 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 367 366 355 304 209 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Read 392 Write 344 Mixed 342 SusWrite 327 79% 351 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 74.4 4K Mixed 23.5 97% 38.8 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 270 224% 324 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 121%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 906GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 138 138 138 139 140 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Read 147 Write 122 Mixed 49.6 SusWrite 138 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.6 207% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB 144,145 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 11 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 13.2 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 99.8 40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X510UAR Builds (Compare 623 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X510UAR

CPU
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	513x
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples	68x
Core i3-8130UIntelBench 48%, 25,471 samples	42x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	622x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	1x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	75x
THNSNK128GVN8 128GBToshibaBench 56%, 2,065 samples	69x
SD8SN8U128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 7,802 samples	21x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	201x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	107x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GBHynixBench 32%, 32,443 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16