Ncstech 123390

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	59% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Ncstech 123390 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK P8H61-M LE/CSM
Memory	7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120510
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 03 '19 at 03:31
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1240 2,292 User benchmarks, average bench 70% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 87.6 1-Core 92.9 2-Core 169 69% 117 Pts	4-Core 293 8-Core 437 46% 365 Pts	64-Core 460 28% 460 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6163) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.17 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	59% Above average	Lighting 73.1 Reflection 78.4 Parallax 66.2 60% 72.6 fps	MRender 68.5 Gravity 68.3 Splatting 74.1 58% 70.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4,295 Write 2,902 Mixed 3,294 776% 3,497 MB/s	4K Read 260 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 91.7 572% 156 MB/s	DQ Read 649 DQ Write 487 DQ Mixed 504 394% 547 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB 23,667 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 466GB free Firmware: CA12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 108 109 109 109 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Read 108 Write 102 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 108 68% 93.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 168% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 61%
WD WD5000AVVS-63H0B1 500GB 11,411 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 93GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 59 60 60 60 59 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	32.1% Below average	Read 52.5 Write 50.8 Mixed 44.3 SusWrite 59.1 38% 51.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 51%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 58GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 134 135 143 142 136 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 104 Write 105 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 137 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 04CD F3-1600C9-8GXM 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.7% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 8.6 25% 8.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 8.8 26% 9.1 GB/s	Latency 69.9 57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Ncstech 123390

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)