Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190125
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 27 '19 at 10:43
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Memory 84.5 1-Core 103 2-Core 229 78% 139 Pts	4-Core 440 8-Core 649 68% 545 Pts	64-Core 904 56% 904 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1655 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.17 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 43% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$61 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 32GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 390 324 324 345 328 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 460 Mixed 420 SusWrite 359 98% 435 MB/s	4K Read 34.6 4K Write 83.8 4K Mixed 48 158% 55.5 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 362 DQ Mixed 308 249% 353 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 125%
Kingston SUV300S37A120G 120GB 4,336 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 63GB free Firmware: SAFM11.K SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 45 65 42 26 37 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	66.8% Good	Read 495 Write 92 Mixed 194 SusWrite 45.2 45% 206 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 86.6 4K Mixed 34.9 115% 45.9 MB/s	DQ Read 314 DQ Write 53.9 DQ Mixed 159 123% 175 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 83%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2470 Write 1,473 Mixed 1,035 364% 1,659 MB/s	4K Read 48.9 4K Write 155 4K Mixed 83.2 263% 95.6 MB/s	DQ Read 936 DQ Write 988 DQ Mixed 978 731% 967 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 281GB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 152 131 100 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Read 111 Write 105 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 116 67% 92.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 108%
ASMT 2115 500GB 2,879 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 85GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 31 26 32 29 32 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 166%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$83 8,676 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	98.7% Outstanding	MC Read 40.2 MC Write 34.4 MC Mixed 33.4 103% 36 GB/s	SC Read 22.8 SC Write 35.2 SC Mixed 26.5 80% 28.2 GB/s	Latency 72.6 55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 98.7% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	268x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	87x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	79x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	59x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	44x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	44x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	39x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	38x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	34x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	38x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	37x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $971

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)