| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible. |
| Graphics | 0.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
| Motherboard | Pegatron To be filled by O.E.M. (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100511 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 26 '19 at 00:32 |
| Run Duration | 161 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 32% |
| CPU Throttled | 80% |
PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
11.1%
Very poor
|
11% 14.2 Pts
|
2% 17.8 Pts
|
2% 23.7 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
Elitegroup(1019 2015) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
|
0.67%
Terrible
|
0% 0.75 fps
|
1% 1.26 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0005HPM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 39 34 8.3 3 12 MB/s
|
14%
Very poor
|
11% 14.5 MB/s
|
23% 0.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
11.7%
Very poor
|
12% 4.07 GB/s
|
10% 3.43 GB/s
|
12% 329 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Pegatron To be filled by O.E.M.
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Processor Model UnknownAMDBench 56%, 1,209 samples | 1x |
| Athlon II X4 630AMDBench 45%, 7,197 samples | 1x |
| Athlon II X3 445AMD $100Bench 44%, 3,101 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples | 2x |
| R9 280AMD $185Bench 30%, 33,175 samples | 1x |
| GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |