Gigabyte GA-B250N Phoenix WIFI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive97.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B250N Phoenix WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B250N Phoenix WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '19 at 14:39
Run Duration296 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4500-$37
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 113
2-Core 222
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 224
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4860
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.21% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 9.58
Parallax 5.91
5% 7.33 fps
MRender 8.43
Gravity 5.23
Splatting 13.9
8% 9.18 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.21%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLV128 128GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 148 145 146 148 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 685
Write 155
Mixed 191
SusWrite 147
64% 294 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 20.4
158% 69.2 MB/s
DQ Read 557
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 229
201% 313 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 311%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 131 118 130 129 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 138
Write 139
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 128
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 75%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
3TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 134 136 132 140 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 172
Write 164
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 135
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
452% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 104%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 93 93 98 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 94.4
Write 85.5
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 94.2
61% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 67%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
184GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 95 96 101 107 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 120
Write 59.9
Mixed 20
SusWrite 102
54% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.5% Very good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 23.6
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 22.4
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B250N Phoenix WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B250N Phoenix WIFI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $328
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback