Fujitsu CELSIUS R630

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	5.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	24.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (98%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS R630 (all builds)
Motherboard	Tyan D1691
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20041201
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 18 '19 at 15:36
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	98%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.60GHz 48 User benchmarks, average bench 31% CPU0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Memory 30.4 1-Core 21.2 2-Core 48.1 20% 33.2 Pts	4-Core 51.1 8-Core 52.2 7% 51.7 Pts	64-Core 48.9 3% 48.9 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7670 3,465 User benchmarks, average bench 6% AMD(1002 7600) ≥ 4GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	5.93% Terrible	Lighting 7.43 Reflection 7.27 Parallax 5.5 6% 6.73 fps	MRender 7.71 Gravity 5.23 Splatting 7.65 6% 6.87 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.93% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 69 76 78 81 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	24.8% Poor	Read 96.3 Write 80.3 Mixed 79 SusWrite 73.9 18% 82.4 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 19 4K Mixed 15.7 47% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 21.7 DQ Write 44.3 DQ Mixed 14 16% 26.7 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 85%
Seagate ST373207LW 73GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 67GB free Firmware: 0005 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 56 66 67 70 70 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	38.4% Below average	Read 71 Write 74.5 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 62.4 47% 64.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 39%
Seagate ST373207LW 73GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 64GB free Firmware: 0003 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 57 65 66 70 70 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Read 67.3 Write 64 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 62.7 42% 56.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 39%
Seagate ST373207LW 73GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 64GB free Firmware: 7808 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 57 62 64 69 69 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	38% Below average	Read 70.5 Write 66 Mixed 48 SusWrite 61.4 45% 61.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	6.75% Terrible	MC Read 2.3 MC Write 1.9 MC Mixed 2.3 6% 2.17 GB/s	SC Read 1.4 SC Write 1.3 SC Mixed 1.6 4% 1.43 GB/s	Latency 252 16% 252 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 6.75% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS R630 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R630

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon 3.60GHz1stBench 31%, 48 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples	1x

RAM
8x1GBUnknownBench 98%, 1,329 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $152

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Fujitsu CELSIUS R630

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R630

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)