Fujitsu FMVNC5BC4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemFujitsu FMVNC5BC4  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB1D7
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20071002
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '19 at 05:12
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 T7200-$57
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Memory 66.4
1-Core 23
2-Core 44.3
32% 44.6 Pts
4-Core 44.9
8-Core 45
6% 45 Pts
64-Core 45.9
3% 45.9 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 37%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHZ2080BH G2 80GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00000009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 57 55 55 56 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 49.4
Write 49.6
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 55.4
34% 46.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 34%
Sony Storage Media 16GB
12GB free, PID 05ba
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
0.99% Terrible
Read 0.7
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 0.7
1% 0.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
19% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.99%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback