PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 41.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Asus CG5270 (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK CG5270 |
Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20090925 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 16 '19 at 01:51 |
Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 93% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q8300-$115
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
|
39.4%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41.9%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 140 166 170 182 172 MB/s
|
30.9%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$73
730GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 56 58 45 58 50 MB/s
|
21.5%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
|
15.1%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q8300Intel $115Bench 44%, 20,482 samples | 3x |
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
G45/G43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 1%, 6,554 samples | 1x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 1x |
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 51% - Above average | Total price: $205 |