| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | AMD Mandolin-PCO (all builds) |
| Motherboard | AMD Mandolin-PCO |
| Memory | 11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20181112 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 15 '19 at 13:51 |
| Run Duration | 115 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Eng Sample: ZM370SC4T4MFG_38/22_Y
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
|
42.4%
Average
|
45% 80.7 Pts
|
32% 260 Pts
|
22% 356 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon PICASSO Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.12
|
12.4%
Very poor
|
12% 16.3 fps
|
12% 14.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$70
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 375 385 410 418 422 MB/s
|
87.3%
Excellent
|
88% 392 MB/s
|
113% 40.3 MB/s
|
158% 212 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 1333 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
60.8%
Good
|
65% 22.7 GB/s
|
48% 16.7 GB/s
|
23% 174 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Mandolin-PCO Builds (Compare 2 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: AMD Mandolin-PCO
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples | 1x |
| GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 42%, 33,798 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |