Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181206
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '19 at 13:25
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 71
1-Core 121
2-Core 226
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 730
70% 577 Pts
64-Core 1,176
73% 1,176 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 75%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.81
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.9% Average
Lighting 47.2
Reflection 54.9
Parallax 44.5
38% 48.9 fps
MRender 94.7
Gravity 93.6
Splatting 62
66% 83.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston KC1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$320
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E7FT04.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 997
Write 1,255
Mixed 526
207% 926 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 37.3
133% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 911
DQ Write 772
DQ Mixed 524
479% 736 MB/s
Poor: 107% Great: 209%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
189GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 215 228 233 233 232 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 477
Mixed 350
SusWrite 246
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 98.5
4K Mixed 52.5
177% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 338
263% 362 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 107%
Great: 114%
Crucial BX300 480GB-$70
114GB free
Firmware: M2CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 467 466 473 473 473 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 472
Mixed 420
SusWrite 468
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 41.1
139% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 311
251% 354 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 109%
Great: 121%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
827GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 149 152 151 151 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 136
Write 123
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 151
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 109%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
897GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 80 86 86 85 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 92.5
Mixed 39
SusWrite 84.8
56% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
57% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.5% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 24.8
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 21.9
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $678
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback