MSI Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics37.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B58
MotherboardMSI Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58)  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171030
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '19 at 13:58
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU 58%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8350K-$139
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 95.1
1-Core 128
2-Core 261
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 464
40% 345 Pts
64-Core 493
30% 493 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Lighting 47.4
Reflection 33.2
Parallax 40.7
39% 40.4 fps
MRender 42.5
Gravity 44.3
Splatting 38.8
34% 41.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 237 243 245 246 241 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 2,001
Write 1,298
Mixed 513
SusWrite 283
225% 1,024 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 56.3
221% 87.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,080
DQ Write 1,031
DQ Mixed 742
643% 951 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 212%
Great: 236%
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB
117GB free
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 39 29 130 128 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 444
Write 322
Mixed 184
SusWrite 120
59% 267 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 18.2
72% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 86
DQ Mixed 40.7
47% 80.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 56%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
465GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 84 87 90 90 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 94
Write 90.2
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 88.1
60% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 50%
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2010)-$60
591GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 55 57 56 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 88
Write 88.8
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 55.8
53% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 48%
WD My Passport 25EA 4TB
111GB free, PID 25ea
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 79 81 81 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 119
Write 97
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 80.3
119% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.2
45% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 30.9
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 26
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 56.9
70% 56.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58) Builds (Compare 2,175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $1,001
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback