ECS H110M-C3D_C3V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	ECS H110M-C3D_C3V (all builds)
Memory	6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170120
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 12 '19 at 11:24
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4560-$31 70,054 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 91.4 1-Core 111 2-Core 205 79% 136 Pts	4-Core 310 8-Core 313 42% 312 Pts	64-Core 311 19% 311 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 418.81 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	Lighting 40.4 Reflection 33.1 Parallax 42.7 33% 38.7 fps	MRender 41.9 Gravity 39 Splatting 37.6 32% 39.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 84 99 107 112 107 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 124 Write 113 Mixed 71.7 SusWrite 97.7 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 70%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 192GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 52 54 55 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	28.9% Poor	Read 47.4 Write 50.9 Mixed 36.5 SusWrite 53.1 35% 47 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 94% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 1x8GB 10,361 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	48.9% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 14.7 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 65.1 62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-C3D_C3V Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: ECS H110M-C3D_C3V

CPU
Core i3-6100Intel $76Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	3x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	1x
Core i3-6100TIntel $108Bench 58%, 6,076 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	1x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $89Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	2x
AGILITY2 50GBOCZBench 30%, 16 samples	1x
Green 2.5 240GBWDBench 60%, 1,708 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 4,222 samples	3x
KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/4G 12GBKingstonBench 41%, 831 samples	1x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $224

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $125	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16