Gigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics59.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte H370AORUSGAMING3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '19 at 13:38
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 83.8
2-Core 152
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 380
42% 331 Pts
64-Core 479
30% 479 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.1% Above average
Lighting 73.6
Reflection 74.4
Parallax 65.4
60% 71.1 fps
MRender 70.9
Gravity 68.8
Splatting 70.2
57% 69.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 533 319 313 304 297 293 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,723
Write 1,404
Mixed 660
SusWrite 343
229% 1,032 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 52.2
195% 68.4 MB/s
DQ Read 614
DQ Write 544
DQ Mixed 607
448% 588 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 175%
Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
723GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 182 182 180 183 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 146
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 182
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 102%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
67.6% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 21.5
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 19.5
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF Builds (Compare 415 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $345
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback