Asrock X99M Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics78.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99M Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150306
Uptime29.4 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '19 at 15:25
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 181
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 600
55% 458 Pts
64-Core 804
50% 804 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.1% Very good
Lighting 93.8
Reflection 99.2
Parallax 84
76% 92.3 fps
MRender 96.5
Gravity 96.7
Splatting 103
81% 98.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 231 224 212 208 205 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 445
Mixed 359
SusWrite 223
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 45.7
154% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 340
259% 349 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 124%
Kingston SSDNow V300 480GB-$250
122GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 188 203 199 203 198 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 388
Write 239
Mixed 259
SusWrite 202
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 19.1
65% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 82.3
DQ Mixed 95.5
82% 124 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54%
Great: 65%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
749GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 139 165 163 164 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 150
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 157
94% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR1 CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR1 CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBD2 CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBD2 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
96.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 34.4
106% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 19.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 80 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $489
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback