Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3160 1,747 User benchmarks, average bench 28% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Memory 48.2 1-Core 22.4 2-Core 44.9 26% 38.5 Pts	4-Core 88.2 8-Core 88.5 12% 88.3 Pts	64-Core 89.7 6% 89.7 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 22B1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.8% Terrible	Lighting 0.07 Reflection 2.62 Parallax 2.53 0% 1.74 fps	MRender 2.52 Gravity 1.77 Splatting 3.61 2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.8% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SB8W128G1122 128GB 157 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6107000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 105 105 103 104 105 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Read 455 Write 265 Mixed 210 SusWrite 108 57% 260 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 44.2 4K Mixed 31.1 103% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 209 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 178 138% 188 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 89%
Kanguru FlashBlu 4GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 3GB free, PID 1101 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 6 8.9 9.3 9 9.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	5.81% Terrible	Read 18.1 Write 9.3 Mixed 10.6 SusWrite 7.7 14% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 26% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.81% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 1x2GB 409 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	20.5% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 6.4 21% 7.47 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 3.9 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 168 24% 168 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16