Mousecomputer MS-7522

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	85.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Mousecomputer MS-7522 (all builds)
Motherboard	MouseComputer X58A-SD40 (MS-7522)
Memory	7.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110823
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 29 '19 at 01:03
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	68%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 980-$148 2,215 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Memory 89.8 1-Core 66.7 2-Core 164 64% 107 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 442 46% 371 Pts	64-Core 618 38% 618 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6286) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.7 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	85.8% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 138 Parallax 108 88% 118 fps	MRender 110 Gravity 116 Splatting 83.8 82% 103 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39 62,883 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 182GB free (System drive) Firmware: X31200RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 218 211 211 208 193 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.7% Above average	Read 237 Write 222 Mixed 190 SusWrite 211 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 39.1 4K Mixed 21.2 71% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 170 132% 181 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 108%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 40GB free Firmware: MN6O SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 78 80 88 79 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	Read 38.5 Write 48.2 Mixed 27.8 SusWrite 83.8 36% 49.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 82% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 85%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89 48,059 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 38GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 76 78 72 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	44.3% Average	Read 80.5 Write 39.8 Mixed 42.2 SusWrite 73.9 44% 59.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 59%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100 5,498 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 20GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 91.8 Write 86.5 Mixed 49.2 56% 75.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 68%
BUFFALO HD-PNTU3 1TB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 160GB free, PID 0247 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 75 74 72 73 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	31.8% Below average	Read 75.8 Write 75.5 Mixed 37.3 SusWrite 73.7 88% 65.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 41%
Generic MassStorageClass 64GB 1,679 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 57GB free, PID 0749 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 27 25 26 30 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 64.5 Write 7.5 Mixed 17.7 SusWrite 25.3 31% 28.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 1.5 79% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 20GB 10,519 User benchmarks, average bench 39% null MHz 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.5% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 8.1 25% 8.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 8 19% 6.77 GB/s	Latency 67.5 59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-7522 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: Mousecomputer MS-7522

CPU
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 580Nvidia $450Bench 23%, 15,395 samples	4x
GTX 560 Ti (448 Core LE)NvidiaBench 19%, 2,165 samples	2x

SSD
8G 128GBWt200-12Bench 45%, 5 samples	3x
WT200-128G 128GBBench 62%, 25 samples	2x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $450

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $125	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16