PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR (all builds) |
Memory | 8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180322 |
Uptime | 2.2 Days |
Run Date | Jan 26 '19 at 17:42 |
Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 25% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
89.4%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.7%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 19 11 20 20 40 MB/s
|
31.3%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
39GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 132 170 173 171 MB/s
|
89.9%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
66.1%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 642x |
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 139x |
Core i5-9600KFIntel $180Bench 93%, 65,122 samples | 138x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 165x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 116x |
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 113x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $529 |