Asus P8Z77-V PRO/THUNDERBOLT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V PRO/THUNDERBOLT  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '19 at 14:29
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 44%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2550K-$119
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 87.6
2-Core 181
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 326
38% 296 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Lighting 45.4
Reflection 30.9
Parallax 38
37% 38.1 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 41.5
Splatting 36.3
31% 38.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 63 23 68 9.1 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 448
Write 368
Mixed 409
SusWrite 76.1
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 1.1
53% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 8.2
DQ Mixed 0.4
16% 40.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 100%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
386GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 123 121 122 121 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 104
Write 102
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 120
72% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
505GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 136 135 136 137 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 126
Write 69.8
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 135
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
208% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 0443 RMR5030KQ68F9F1600 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.6% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 8.4
26% 9.23 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 9.4
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V PRO/THUNDERBOLT Builds (Compare 157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V PRO/THUNDERBOLT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $401
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback