Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	9.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	94.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK WS-C621E-SAGE Series
Memory	186 GB free of 192 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180430
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '19 at 15:23
Run Duration	213 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 5120 87 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU1, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Memory 77.6 1-Core 101 2-Core 190 70% 123 Pts	4-Core 375 8-Core 707 64% 541 Pts	64-Core 3,196 198% 3,196 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P400 5,817 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Nvidia(10DE 11BE) 2GB CLim: 1252 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	9.72% Terrible	Lighting 11.9 Reflection 10.3 Parallax 9.03 10% 10.4 fps	MRender 10 Gravity 9.73 Splatting 14.7 10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.72% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300 8,179 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 831GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 250 250 250 255 251 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	Read 421 Write 407 Mixed 389 SusWrite 251 82% 367 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 81.3 4K Mixed 42.9 148% 52.5 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 356 268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 132%
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300 8,179 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 954GB free Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 252 250 250 255 251 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	94% Outstanding	Read 413 Write 407 Mixed 379 SusWrite 252 82% 363 MB/s	4K Read 33.7 4K Write 77.9 4K Mixed 43.8 148% 51.8 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 353 266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 132%
Hitachi HUH721010ALE600 10TB 447 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 9.5TB free Firmware: T384 SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 237 233 240 229 233 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	137% Outstanding	Read 240 Write 242 Mixed 118 SusWrite 234 152% 208 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 6.8 4K Mixed 0.9 309% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 135%
Hitachi HUH721010ALE600 10TB 447 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 9.5TB free Firmware: T384 SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 235 236 229 231 232 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	133% Outstanding	Read 230 Write 230 Mixed 114 SusWrite 232 147% 201 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 1.2 314% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 135%
Hitachi HUH721010ALE600 10TB 447 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 9.5TB free Firmware: T384 SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 229 226 232 234 229 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	Read 219 Write 222 Mixed 113 SusWrite 229 143% 196 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 1.2 314% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 135%
Hitachi HUH721010ALE600 10TB 447 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 9.5TB free Firmware: T384 SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 222 227 230 236 231 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	130% Outstanding	Read 221 Write 223 Mixed 108 SusWrite 230 143% 195 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 1.2 324% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 135%
Hitachi HUH721010ALE600 10TB 447 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 9.5TB free Firmware: T384 SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 235 233 224 221 228 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	131% Outstanding	Read 229 Write 230 Mixed 126 SusWrite 227 149% 203 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 1.1 297% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 135%
Hitachi HUH721010ALE600 10TB 447 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 9.5TB free Firmware: T384 SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 225 233 233 226 235 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	133% Outstanding	Read 230 Write 227 Mixed 124 SusWrite 232 149% 203 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 1.1 299% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 135%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965698-001.A00G 12x16GB 12 of 12 slots used 192GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	126% Outstanding	MC Read 49.2 MC Write 59.6 MC Mixed 50.4 152% 53.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 6.8 19% 6.73 GB/s	Latency 85 47% 85 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical WS-C621E-SAGE Series Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 157%

UFO

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 213%

UFO

System: Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

CPU
CPU: Intel 0000%@1stBench 76%, 50 samples	15x
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4214R1stBench 70%, 89 samples	10x
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 41101stBench 62%, 546 samples	10x

GPU
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,148Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	15x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	14x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	11x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	18x
AN1500 2TBWd_blackBench 325%, 313 samples	11x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	9x

RAM
M393A4K40CB2-CTD 4x31.8GBSamsungBench 77%, 188 samples	9x
18ASF2G72PDZ-2G9J3 8x16GBMicronBench 100%, 7 samples	6x
M393A4K40CB2-CTD 6x31.8GBSamsungBench 123%, 52 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $1,255

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16