Toshiba Satellite C55t-C

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite C55t-C (all builds)
Motherboard	FF50 06F2
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160111
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '19 at 06:26
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	72%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-5020U 3,262 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Memory 49.9 1-Core 51.3 2-Core 74.2 37% 58.5 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 125 21% 147 Pts	64-Core 142 9% 142 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) 231,498 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 F840) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4281 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	4.08% Terrible	Lighting 3.97 Reflection 6.58 Parallax 5.81 3% 5.45 fps	MRender 6.76 Gravity 4.33 Splatting 9.04 6% 6.71 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.08% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132 14,258 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 136GB free (System drive) Firmware: LCSi SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 89 92 93 107 139 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.2% Above average	Read 262 Write 166 Mixed 201 SusWrite 104 41% 183 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 41.5 4K Mixed 24.2 84% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 185 138% 184 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 88%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB 8,748 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 59GB free, PID 1000, Samsung Bar Plus 64GB Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 24 24 24 25 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Read 205 Write 23.2 Mixed 31.5 SusWrite 24.3 66% 70.9 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 10.9 4K Mixed 8 678% 9.5 MB/s	DQ Read 15.6 DQ Write 10.6 DQ Mixed 11.2 799% 12.5 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1315 CT102464BF160B.C16 16GB 168 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	41.8% Average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 14.7 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 8.8 26% 9.2 GB/s	Latency 161 25% 161 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C55t-C Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55t-C

CPU
Core i3-5020UIntelBench 51%, 3,262 samples	64x
Core i3-4005UIntelBench 39%, 37,483 samples	7x
Celeron N3050IntelBench 19%, 14,457 samples	3x

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	63x
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	7x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	6x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	3x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	3x
SU650 512GBAdataBench 85%, 1,519 samples	2x

RAM
TSB16D3LFS1KBG/2G TSB16D3LS1MNG/4G 6GBKingstonBench 41%, 215 samples	14x
TSB16D3LFS1KBG/2G Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 6GBKingstonBench 40%, 186 samples	9x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 Kingston TSB16D3LFS1KBG/2G 6GBSamsungBench 40%, 216 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $66

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16