Samsung 270E5J/2570EJ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (98%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Samsung 270E5J/2570EJ (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NT270E5R-KD2S
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140903
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '19 at 07:52
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	98%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 3558U 1,744 User benchmarks, average bench 42% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	Memory 46.6 1-Core 35.5 2-Core 34.9 28% 39 Pts	4-Core 30.3 8-Core 34.6 4% 32.4 Pts	64-Core 32.2 2% 32.2 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz) 43,454 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C737) 1GB Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4235 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.88% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 3.27 Parallax 2.91 2% 2.75 fps	MRender 3.48 Gravity 1.03 Splatting 3.52 2% 2.68 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.88% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 433GB free (System drive) Firmware: AM002F SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 79 78 79 77 81 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Read 81.9 Write 78.5 Mixed 29.7 SusWrite 75.3 48% 66.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GB 51,191 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 6.5 19% 6.5 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 0.5 6% 2.17 GB/s	Latency 174 23% 174 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 270E5J/2570EJ Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 270E5J/2570EJ

CPU
Core i5-4210UIntelBench 41%, 82,966 samples	59x
Core i7-4510UIntelBench 47%, 63,054 samples	43x
Core i5-4200UIntel $281Bench 43%, 64,450 samples	42x

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	136x
GeForce 710MNvidiaBench 3%, 2,241 samples	21x
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	3x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	3x

RAM
SH5641G8FJ8NWRNSQR 1x8GBSmartBench 28%, 1,144 samples	84x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	41x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16