Asrock N68C-S UCC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock N68C-S UCC  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110303
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 10 '19 at 15:49
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 7550 Dual-Core
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Memory 51.4
1-Core 17.9
2-Core 23.6
24% 31 Pts
4-Core 28.5
8-Core 30.7
4% 29.6 Pts
64-Core 30.5
2% 30.5 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Sapphire(174B E164) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1010
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.15% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 1.85
Parallax 1.62
1% 1.61 fps
MRender 1.81
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.78
1% 1.48 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.15%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 149 168 83 24 23 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.7% Average
Read 220
Write 182
Mixed 183
SusWrite 99.4
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 25.6
84% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 41.8
DQ Write 70
DQ Mixed 53.6
41% 55.1 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 124%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 143 151 150 151 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 151
Write 124
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 147
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
567GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 148 165 168 170 175 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 125
Write 109
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 163
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
152GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 68 70 65 64 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 86.6
Write 91.6
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 66.6
56% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 101%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
10GB free, PID a009
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 22 24 23 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 60
Write 58.4
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 24
55% 42.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 44%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7
57GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 7.6 18 21 12 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 80.9
Write 20.8
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 14.2
39% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.9
58% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
13.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 5
13% 4.5 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 4.2
8% 2.83 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-S UCC Builds (Compare 213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-S UCC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback