PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock AB350 Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180115 |
Uptime | 11.4 Days |
Run Date | Jan 06 '19 at 18:18 |
Run Duration | 154 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 19% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
60.5%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 281 219 210 199 184 MB/s
|
88.7%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 133 141 142 142 142 MB/s
|
79.3%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
688GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 125 131 131 130 130 MB/s
|
73.7%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 141 154 151 145 157 MB/s
|
61.1%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3066 MHz clocked @ 1533 MHz
|
55%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 461x |
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 223x |
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples | 131x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 201x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 166x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 114x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $490 |